Advertisement
I'm surprised nobody brought up this little gem.
Amazing adaptation.
--S
Amazing adaptation.
--S
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 4:55 PMI'm afraid I haven't read the original book, but I did enjoy the film quite a bit. In fact, I was laughing for most of the movie, up until the end...some of their antics reminded me of Curb Your Enthusiasm a bit, though with drug addicts instead of aging Jewish entertainers.
-
Unsu...
Re: Scanner Darkly
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 7:10 PMI read the book.. I don't remember any cyberpunk elements... -
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 8:34 PM"I don't remember any cyberpunk elements..."
Uh-oh -- back to defining "cyberpunk" again.
"Scanner" has a dystopian near-future, paranoia, and technologically advanced surveillance and personal camouflage. All cyberpunk to me.
Just because nobody jacked into the Net doesn't mean it's not cyberpunk. Not everything can be "GITS: SAC." -
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 8:47 PMIs there a Phillip K. Dick book turned into a movie that *doesn't* have Cyberpunk elements? -
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Fri, January 12, 2007 - 9:02 PMSince every cyberpunk author I know of gives enormous kudos to Philip K Dick every time they're asked about influences, I'd say that it's highly unlikely that his work doesn't qualify.
(exception being alternate history: A Man in a High Castle)
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Sat, January 13, 2007 - 12:16 AM"Is there a Phillip K. Dick book turned into a movie that *doesn't* have Cyberpunk elements?"
Well, in a way, "Truman Show" is the least cyberpunk, and it's basically "Time Out of Joint." It's more like media critique than cyberpunk.
Though, again, you have paranoia, and a notion that the world is unreal -- which ties into cyberpunk concepts like "The Matrix" or VR.
-
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Sat, January 13, 2007 - 6:36 AMThere was also substance D itself, and the pervasive surveillance.
I thought it was an extremely disturbing movie.
-
-
-
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Sat, January 13, 2007 - 1:54 PMWhat role is Mark Foley playing now? Bob Arctor or Fred Arctor?
-
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Sat, January 13, 2007 - 2:52 PM
-
Re: Scanner Darkly
Thu, January 25, 2007 - 9:11 AMI'm a bit late to this thread, but I thought Scanner was great. the shifting edges of the animation were a subtle visual reminder of the unreliable nature of reality, a major theme in the book. I thought that was more successful than having the carpets turn into monsters or whatever like in Fear and Loathing (although that worked in that film).
the one thing that surprised me about Scanner was the representation of the scattersuits - in the book the people who wear them are described as being "a vague blur," which I always thought would be so great when you want more anonymity in social spaces. but after I saw what linklater did I realized that an entire movie filled with "vague blurs" was not going to be very visually interesting! having the suits show shifting features was definitely more to look at, although a little nausea-inducing.
and isn't it funny how an animated keanu reeves is no more animated than a real one!! the perfect symbol of alienation, that guy.